Chappell v. O'Brien
22 App. D.C. 190, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 5523
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court:
The motion to dismiss must be sustained. The orders entered are not final decrees disposing of the case. National Bank v. Smith, 156 U. S. 330, 333, 39 L. ed. 441, 442, 15 Sup. Ct. Rep. 358, and cases cited. Nor are they such interlocutory orders as are appealable under the act conferring jurisdiction upon this court. D. C. Code, § 226. It follows that both appeals must be dismissed, with costs; and it is so ordered.
Appeal dismissed.
A motion for a reargument was denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Chappell v. O'Brien, 22 App. D.C. 190, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 5523 (D.C. Cir. 1903).
22 App. D.C. 190 (Chappell v. O'Brien) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Clark v. DISTRICT DISCOUNT COMPANY, INC.
151 A.2d 198 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1959)
Serkowich v. Wardell
102 F.2d 253 (D.C. Circuit, 1938)