Chappell v. O'Brien

D.C. Circuit

Chappell v. O'Brien

22 App. D.C. 190, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 5523

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedJune 3, 1903

DocketNo. 188

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 22 App. D.C. 190 (Chappell v. O'Brien) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chappell v. O'Brien, 22 App. D.C. 190, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 5523 (D.C. Cir. 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Shepard

delivered the opinion of the court:

The motion to dismiss must be sustained. The orders entered are not final decrees disposing of the case. National Bank v. Smith, 156 U. S. 330, 333, 39 L. ed. 441, 442, 15 Sup. Ct. Rep. 358, and cases cited. Nor are they such interlocutory orders as are appealable under the act conferring jurisdiction upon this court. D. C. Code, § 226. It follows that both appeals must be dismissed, with costs; and it is so ordered.

Appeal dismissed.

A motion for a reargument was denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI