Chappell v. McCown
This text of 87 S.E. 147 (Chappell v. McCown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The opinion of the Court, en banc, was delivered
The petitioner sought in this action to enjoin the holding of the election which was. authorized by act of the legislature (29 Stat. 88) on the question of the prohibition of the manufacture and sale of alcoholic liquors and beverages in this State.
The motion for injunction was heard by the Court en banc last August, and, at that time, an order was filed refusing it, and stating that the reason therefor would be given later.
It is not deemed necessary to discuss the various grounds urged by petitioner why the election should be enjoined, or *10 those urged by respondents why it should not. It is sufficient to say that the Court was and is unanimously of the opinion that the motion should be refused on the ground that petitioner has an adequate remedy at law.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
87 S.E. 147, 103 S.C. 6, 1915 S.C. LEXIS 242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chappell-v-mccown-sc-1915.