Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Chappell v. Ford

Chappell v. Ford

112 S.E. 364, 153 Ga. 335, 1922 Ga. LEXIS 79
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMay 12, 1922
DocketNo. 2714
StatusPublished

This text of 112 S.E. 364 (Chappell v. Ford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chappell v. Ford, 112 S.E. 364, 153 Ga. 335, 1922 Ga. LEXIS 79 (Ga. 1922).

Opinion

Eish, C. J.

There was no abuse of discretion, in refusing an interlocutory injunction on conflicting evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
112 S.E. 364, 153 Ga. 335, 1922 Ga. LEXIS 79, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chappell-v-ford-ga-1922.