Chappell v. Beavers

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Chappell v. Beavers

148 S.E. 287, 39 Ga. App. 688, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 515

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMay 15, 1929

Docket19605

StatusPublished

This text of 148 S.E. 287 (Chappell v. Beavers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chappell v. Beavers, 148 S.E. 287, 39 Ga. App. 688, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 515 (Ga. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. There is no sufficient assignment of error in the bill of exceptions either upon the exceptions pendente lite or upon the ruling therein complained of. It follows that the exceptions pendente lite can not be considered by this court.

2. The verdict was amply authorized by the evidence, and the overruling of the motion for a new trial (based upon the usual general grounds) was not error.

3. This court not being satisfied that the writ of error was prosecuted for the purpose of delay only, the request of the defendant in error, that damages be awarded him because of bringing the case to this court for the purpose of delay only, is denied.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke a/nd Bloodworth, JJ., conour.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI