Chappell v. Ayala
135 S. Ct. 401, 190 L. Ed. 2d 288, 83 U.S.L.W. 3234, 2014 U.S. LEXIS 7094
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 20, 2014
DocketNo. 13–1428.
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases
This text of 135 S. Ct. 401 (Chappell v. Ayala) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Chappell v. Ayala, 135 S. Ct. 401, 190 L. Ed. 2d 288, 83 U.S.L.W. 3234, 2014 U.S. LEXIS 7094 (U.S. 2014).
Opinion
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted. In addition to the question presented by the petition, the parties are directed to brief and argue the following question: "Whether the court of appeals properly applied the standard articulated in Brecht v. Abrahamson,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Mark Jensen v. Marc Clements
800 F.3d 892 (Seventh Circuit, 2015)
Karl Tobey v. Jeffery Uttecht
601 F. App'x 498 (Ninth Circuit, 2015)
Quintana v. Gate
88 F. Supp. 3d 1102 (C.D. California, 2015)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
135 S. Ct. 401, 190 L. Ed. 2d 288, 83 U.S.L.W. 3234, 2014 U.S. LEXIS 7094, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chappell-v-ayala-scotus-2014.