Chappel v. DELMAR GARDENS OF CHESTERFIELD, LLC

342 S.W.3d 372, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 760, 2011 WL 2237780
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 7, 2011·No. ED 95330·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Alma Chappel (“Employee”) appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“the Commission”) dismissing her claim for workers’ compensation benefits. Employee con *373 tends the Commission’s decision dismissing her claim was not supported by -competent and substantial evidence and was inconsistent with Missouri law.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chappel v. DELMAR GARDENS OF CHESTERFIELD, LLC, 342 S.W.3d 372, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 760, 2011 WL 2237780 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

342 S.W.3d 372 (Chappel v. DELMAR GARDENS OF CHESTERFIELD, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re the Care & Treatment of Miller
342 S.W.3d 372 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)