Chappel v. Coopock

Fourth Circuit

Chappel v. Coopock

538 F. App'x 253

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedAugust 14, 2013

DocketNo. 13-1385

StatusPublished

This text of 538 F. App'x 253 (Chappel v. Coopock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chappel v. Coopock, 538 F. App'x 253 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Mai Chappel appeals the district court’s order dismissing this action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a) for failure to comply with a court order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Chappel v. Coopock, No. 3:13-cv-00084-JRS, 538 Fed.Appx. 253, 2013 WL 4082276 (E.D.Va. Mar. 5, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are [254]*254adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Mai Chappel appeals the district court’s order dismissing this action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a) for failure to comply with a court order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Chappel v. Coopock, No. 3:13-cv-00084-JRS, 538 Fed.Appx. 253, 2013 WL 4082276 (E.D.Va. Mar. 5, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are [254]*254adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

538 F. App'x 253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chappel-v-coopock-ca4-2013.