Chappatte v. F. W. Maurer & Sons Co.

Third Circuit

Chappatte v. F. W. Maurer & Sons Co.

22 F.2d 1009, 1927 U.S. App. LEXIS 3543

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedNovember 17, 1927

DocketNo. 3628

StatusPublished

This text of 22 F.2d 1009 (Chappatte v. F. W. Maurer & Sons Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chappatte v. F. W. Maurer & Sons Co., 22 F.2d 1009, 1927 U.S. App. LEXIS 3543 (3d Cir. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.

In this patent ease validity and infringement are admitted, unless the defendant is entitled to use the alleged infringing machines by virtue of written contracts in which the defendant employed the patentee to invent. The ease turns on the construction of and the effect to be given these contracts, and no principles or precedents are involved. Holding as we do that the court below rightly construed and applied the contracts, we limit ourselves to stating its decree is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.

In this patent ease validity and infringement are admitted, unless the defendant is entitled to use the alleged infringing machines by virtue of written contracts in which the defendant employed the patentee to invent. The ease turns on the construction of and the effect to be given these contracts, and no principles or precedents are involved. Holding as we do that the court below rightly construed and applied the contracts, we limit ourselves to stating its decree is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

22 F.2d 1009, 1927 U.S. App. LEXIS 3543, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chappatte-v-f-w-maurer-sons-co-ca3-1927.