Chapparral Coach Mfg. Inc. v. Freeman

Court of Appeals of Texas

Chapparral Coach Mfg. Inc. v. Freeman

440 S.W.2d 404

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedMarch 13, 1969

DocketNo. 7015

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 440 S.W.2d 404 (Chapparral Coach Mfg. Inc. v. Freeman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chapparral Coach Mfg. Inc. v. Freeman, 440 S.W.2d 404 (Tex. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PARKER, Chief Justice.

Appellee contends in his Motion for Rehearing that this cause was not fully developed by Appellee. It is apparent from the record that this is true for which reason and under the authority of Jackson v. Hall, 147 Tex. 245, 214 S.W.2d 458 (1948), and in the interest of justice, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and this cause remanded to the District Court of Orange County.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PARKER, Chief Justice.

Appellee contends in his Motion for Rehearing that this cause was not fully developed by Appellee. It is apparent from the record that this is true for which reason and under the authority of Jackson v. Hall, 147 Tex. 245, 214 S.W.2d 458 (1948), and in the interest of justice, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and this cause remanded to the District Court of Orange County.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

440 S.W.2d 404, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chapparral-coach-mfg-inc-v-freeman-texapp-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack