Chappa v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANGELO DIVISION BLANCHE E. CHAPPA, Plaintiff, No. 6:24-CV-069-H-BU COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY | ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. ORDER The United States Magistrate Judge issued Findings, Conclusions, anda Recommendation (FCR) that the Court reverse the Commissioner’s decision and remand the case for further administrative action. Dkt. No. 17. No objections were filed, and neither the plaintiff nor the defendant has taken any action in this case since February 2025. See Dkt. Nos. 15; 16. Where no specific objections are filed within the 14-day period, the Court reviews the Magistrate Judge's findings, conclusions, and recommendations only for plain error. Serrano v. Customs & Border Patrol, U.S. Customs & Border Prot., 975 F.3d 488, 502 (Sth Cir. 2020). The District Court has reviewed the FCR for plain error. Finding none, the Court accepts and adopts the FCR. The Commissioner’s decision is reversed, and the case 1s remanded for further administrative action in accordance with the FCR. So ordered on June 30, 2025. (04/%— JAMES WESLEY HENDRIX UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE /
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Chappa v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration (Chappa v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.