Chapman v. Wilber
This text of 6 Hill & Den. 475 (Chapman v. Wilber) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Actions of trespass, and on the case, for injuries to the person, are local; (2 R. S. 409, § 2;) and the objection that the venue is not laid in the proper county may be taken by demurrer. (12 Wend. 51, 265.) The court takes notice of the civil divisions of the state; and we know there is a town called Batavia in the comity of Genesee. We know also that there is no town of that name "in the county of New-York where the venue is laid. It is said that the pleader may have meant Batavia in the East Indies, and so the action may be tried in any county. (17 Wend. 323; 23 id. 484.) But that is not to be intended. The pleader is not at liberty to leave a matter in doubt, and then ask the court to presume in [476]*476his favor; especially where the probability is against the existence of the fact which he wishes to have presumed.
Judgment for the defendants.
See Watts v. Kinney, (ante p. 82.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
6 Hill & Den. 475, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chapman-v-wilber-nysupct-1844.