Chapman v. Welles

1 Kirby 133
CourtConnecticut Superior Court
DecidedSeptember 15, 1786
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Kirby 133 (Chapman v. Welles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chapman v. Welles, 1 Kirby 133 (Colo. Ct. App. 1786).

Opinions

By Law, C. J., Sherman and Pitkin, JJ.

On inquiry, it does not appear that this juror was any way interested in the event of this cause, nor that there is any controversy subsisting between him and the plaintiffs respecting the account found in said Caldwell’s book, nor that anything said respecting that account had influence with the jury in giving their verdict; and the book containing the account referred to was in the plaintiffs’ hands, and by them exhibited on the trial; therefore, it must be presumed they knew the contents of it; and .if they had any exception to the juror, they ought to have challenged him before the trial; but as there appears no ground for a principal challenge, the objection ought not now to be admitted, to set aside the verdict.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Kirby 133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chapman-v-welles-connsuperct-1786.