Chapman v. Upham

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Chapman v. Upham

150 So. 2d 598, 1963 La. App. LEXIS 1380

Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided March 4, 1963·No. No. 992·Published

Opinion

McBRIDE, Judge.

This matter was consolidated for trial with The Employers’ Liability Assurance Corporation, Ltd. v. John D. Upham, d/b/a Upham Engineering Co., et als., La.App., 150 So.2d 595. Plaintiff, Coy Chapman, was injured through the alleged negligence of George Shane, and he seeks to hold United Benefit Fire Insurance Company liable under the extended coverage provisions contained in the same policy of liability insurance involved in the aforesaid case. Whereas the facts and issues herein are the same, for the reasons set forth in our opinion in said case,

The judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McBRIDE, Judge.

This matter was consolidated for trial with The Employers’ Liability Assurance Corporation, Ltd. v. John D. Upham, d/b/a Upham Engineering Co., et als., La.App., 150 So.2d 595. Plaintiff, Coy Chapman, was injured through the alleged negligence of George Shane, and he seeks to hold United Benefit Fire Insurance Company liable under the extended coverage provisions contained in the same policy of liability insurance involved in the aforesaid case. Whereas the facts and issues herein are the same, for the reasons set forth in our opinion in said case,

The judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Chapman v. Upham, 150 So. 2d 598, 1963 La. App. LEXIS 1380 (La. Ct. App. 1963).

Pincite

150 So. 2d 598 (Chapman v. Upham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related