Chapman v. Triplett

Fourth Circuit

Chapman v. Triplett

142 F. App'x 172

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 29, 2005·No. No. 05-6483·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

David Chapman appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Chapman v. Triplett, No. [173]*173CA-04-363-8-18BI (D.S.C. Mar. 14, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

David Chapman appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Chapman v. Triplett, No. [173]*173CA-04-363-8-18BI (D.S.C. Mar. 14, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Chapman v. Triplett, 142 F. App'x 172 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

142 F. App'x 172 (Chapman v. Triplett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related