Chapman v. Thompson
This text of 239 A.D. 758 (Chapman v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Edgcomb, J., who dissents and votes for reversal on the law and for granting a new trial upon the ground that the trial court erred in not charging defendants’ request that neither defendant was under any obligation to erect signs advising of the installation of the asphalt plank and also defendants’ request that no higher duty rested upon the defendants in respect to the condition of the pavement and the asphalt plank than rested upon the State and its highway officials.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
239 A.D. 758, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chapman-v-thompson-nyappdiv-1933.