Chapman v. Sweeney, Sheriff

Sixth Circuit

Chapman v. Sweeney, Sheriff

187 F.2d 532, 1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 2277

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 5, 1951

Docket11232_1

StatusPublished

This text of 187 F.2d 532 (Chapman v. Sweeney, Sheriff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chapman v. Sweeney, Sheriff, 187 F.2d 532, 1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 2277 (6th Cir. 1951).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal has been heard and considered upon the record and the briefs and oral arguments of the attorneys for the appellant and the United States respectively, from all of which it appears that the United States District Court correctly ruled that the appellant who seeks relief on habeas corpus application to a federal court has not exhausted the pursuance of his remedies in the state courts of Ohio.

The order dismissing the petition for habeas corpus is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal has been heard and considered upon the record and the briefs and oral arguments of the attorneys for the appellant and the United States respectively, from all of which it appears that the United States District Court correctly ruled that the appellant who seeks relief on habeas corpus application to a federal court has not exhausted the pursuance of his remedies in the state courts of Ohio.

The order dismissing the petition for habeas corpus is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

187 F.2d 532, 1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 2277, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chapman-v-sweeney-sheriff-ca6-1951.