Chapman v. State

446 S.W.2d 326, 1969 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 889
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided October 29, 1969·No. No. 41812·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OPINION

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is accomplice to robbery; the punishment, twenty years. This is a companion case to Odom v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 438 S.W.2d 912, but the facts even though necessarily the same were presented in a far different manner. In Odom v. State, supra, we held that Angelia Ger-ring (Campbell) was an accomplice witness. In the case at bar the Court failed over proper and timely objection to instruct the jury as a matter of law that such witness was an accomplice and failed to submit the question to the jury of her ac-compliceship as a matter of fact.

Stephenson v. State, 152 Tex.Cr.R. 624, 216 S.W.2d 586, and cases there cited require a reversal of this conviction.

For the error pointed out, the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.

DOUGLAS, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chapman v. State, 446 S.W.2d 326, 1969 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 889 (Tex. 1969).

446 S.W.2d 326 (Chapman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chapman v. State
470 S.W.2d 656 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1971)