Chapman v. State

233 S.W.2d 855, 155 Tex. Crim. 246, 1950 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1826
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided November 15, 1950·No. No. 24977·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

DAVIDSON, Judge.

This is a case of highway robbery; the punishment, thirty-five years in the penitentiary.

Nona Parker, the alleged injured party who was night cashier of a cleaning and pressing establishment, identified the appellant as the party who, on the night of January 10, 1950, at the point of a pistol, required her to deliver to him the currency she had in the cash register.

Appellant did not testify as a witness in his own behalf. The defense of alibi, as shown by other witnesses, was rejected by the jury.

The facts abundantly warrant the jury’s conclusion of guilt. Appellant’s contrary contention, as contained in his Bill of Exception No. 1, is overruled.

Appellant complains because he was not permitted to introduce in evidence his honorable discharge from the Army of the United States.

There is nothing in the record which would authorize the conclusion that the discharge was material to any issue in the case. See Gary v. State, 150 Tex. Cr. R. 397, 201 S. W. 2d 820; Harris v. State, 99 Tex. Cr. 60, 268 S. W. 160.

The other bill of exception being in question-and-answer form, with no certificate by the trial court as to the necessity therefor, cannot be considered.

No reversible error appearing, the judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chapman v. State, 233 S.W.2d 855, 155 Tex. Crim. 246, 1950 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1826 (Tex. 1950).

233 S.W.2d 855 (Chapman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Frey v. State
345 S.W.2d 416 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1961)