Chapman v. State

124 S.W.2d 996
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 15, 1939
DocketNo. 19873
StatusPublished

This text of 124 S.W.2d 996 (Chapman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chapman v. State, 124 S.W.2d 996 (Tex. 1939).

Opinion

On Request for Leave to File Second Motion for Rehearing.

HAWKINS, Judge.

Because appellant’s bills of exception were considered for the first time on motion for rehearing we have examined his request for leave to file second motion.

Appellant calls attention to qualifications on certain bills of exception to which appellant excepted. In most instances the qualifications in no way alter the recitals in the bill but relate only to the reasons of the trial judge for the ruling complained of. We note that the disposition of the bills in our opinion on rehearing seems to have been proper regardless of the qualification which was excepted to. Believing that our former disposition of the case was correct, we must respectfully order that appellant’s second motion for rehearing be overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
124 S.W.2d 996, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chapman-v-state-texcrimapp-1939.