Chapman v. State

39 S.W.2d 887, 118 Tex. Crim. 211, 1931 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 625
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided June 3, 1931·No. No. 14269.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for manufacturing intoxicating liquor, punishment assessed being two years’ confinement in the penitentiary.

The motion for new trial was overruled on October 20, 1930, at which time notice of appeal was given, and ninety days allowed for filing statement of facts and bills of exception.

The statement of facts was not filed in the lower court until the 26th day of January, 1931, which was ninety-eight days after notice of appeal. Under the provisions of article 760, C. C. P. (1925), subd. 5, the statement of facts cannot be considered because of the delayed filing.

There appears in the transcript three bills of exception, one complaining of the denial of continuancee and the other two complaining of the reception of certain evidence. It is impossible to appraise any of *213 these bills in the absence of a statement of facts, and not being able to consider the statement of facts the bills are ineffective.

The judgment is affirmed.

Jffi rmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chapman v. State, 39 S.W.2d 887, 118 Tex. Crim. 211, 1931 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 625 (Tex. 1931).

39 S.W.2d 887 (Chapman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brandt v. State
90 S.W.2d 263 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1936)
Newman v. State
45 S.W.2d 602 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1931)