Chapman v. State
Opinion
Plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Canadian county for the crime of having possession of intoxicating liquor,' with the intention of violating the law, and was on the '27th day óf November, 1909, sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and serve a term of 30 days in the 'county jail; from which judgment he appealed to this court. On April 1, 1910, while said appeal was pending, Acting Governor Bellamy, granted him an unconditional párdon, and he has filed a certified copy of said pardon in this court. The facts as to the pardon in this case are the same as in the case of Hollis Gilmore v. State, ante, p. 639, 108 Pac. 416, and the principles of law are the same and the decision the same.
Therefore it is considered that the appeal be, and the same is hereby, dismissed, and the cause remanded to the county court of Canadian county..
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
1910 OK CR 79 (Chapman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.