Chapman v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Chapman v. State

1910 OK CR 79, 108 P. 418, 3 Okla. Crim. 643, 1910 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 221

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedApril 12, 1910

DocketNo. A-567.

StatusPublished

This text of 1910 OK CR 79 (Chapman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chapman v. State, 1910 OK CR 79, 108 P. 418, 3 Okla. Crim. 643, 1910 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 221 (Okla. Ct. App. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

*644 PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Canadian county for the crime of having possession of intoxicating liquor,' with the intention of violating the law, and was on the '27th day óf November, 1909, sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and serve a term of 30 days in the 'county jail; from which judgment he appealed to this court. On April 1, 1910, while said appeal was pending, Acting Governor Bellamy, granted him an unconditional párdon, and he has filed a certified copy of said pardon in this court. The facts as to the pardon in this case are the same as in the case of Hollis Gilmore v. State, ante, p. 639, 108 Pac. 416, and the principles of law are the same and the decision the same.

Therefore it is considered that the appeal be, and the same is hereby, dismissed, and the cause remanded to the county court of Canadian county..

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*644 PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Canadian county for the crime of having possession of intoxicating liquor,' with the intention of violating the law, and was on the '27th day óf November, 1909, sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and serve a term of 30 days in the 'county jail; from which judgment he appealed to this court. On April 1, 1910, while said appeal was pending, Acting Governor Bellamy, granted him an unconditional párdon, and he has filed a certified copy of said pardon in this court. The facts as to the pardon in this case are the same as in the case of Hollis Gilmore v. State, ante, p. 639, 108 Pac. 416, and the principles of law are the same and the decision the same.

Therefore it is considered that the appeal be, and the same is hereby, dismissed, and the cause remanded to the county court of Canadian county..

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1910 OK CR 79, 108 P. 418, 3 Okla. Crim. 643, 1910 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 221, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chapman-v-state-oklacrimapp-1910.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack