Chapman v. State
103 S.E. 414, 25 Ga. App. 239, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 707
Opinion
1. When considered in connection with’ all the facts of the case and the statement of the judge in his order overruling the motion for a new trial, and in the light of the entire charge, there is no reversible error in any of the excerpts from the charge of which complaint is made.
2. This court has no authority to set aside a verdict approved by the [240] judge, where the record shows no error of law and there is evidence to support the verdict.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Chapman v. State, 103 S.E. 414, 25 Ga. App. 239, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 707 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).
103 S.E. 414 (Chapman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Vaughn, James v. Fairley
44 S.E.2d 461 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1947)