Chapman v. State

103 S.E. 414, 25 Ga. App. 239, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 707
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 14, 1920
Docket11246
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 103 S.E. 414 (Chapman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chapman v. State, 103 S.E. 414, 25 Ga. App. 239, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 707 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

1. When considered in connection with’ all the facts of the case and the statement of the judge in his order overruling the motion for a new trial, and in the light of the entire charge, there is no reversible error in any of the excerpts from the charge of which complaint is made.

2. This court has no authority to set aside a verdict approved by the [240]*240judge, where the record shows no error of law and there is evidence to support the verdict.

Decided April 14, 1920. Conviction of shooting at another; from Jones superior court —.Judge Park. December 27, 1919. Application for certiorari was denied by the Supreme Court. J. C. Barron, R. N. Hardeman, F. Holmes Johnson, contra. Doyle Campbell, solicitor-general, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Vaughn, James v. Fairley
44 S.E.2d 461 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1947)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 S.E. 414, 25 Ga. App. 239, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 707, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chapman-v-state-gactapp-1920.