Chapman v. State

27 S.E. 789, 100 Ga. 311, 1897 Ga. LEXIS 47
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided November 21, 1897·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Simmons, C. J.

l. A medicinal preparation capable of being used as a beverage, and which contains such a percentage of alcohol as that 'if drunk to excess iit will produce intoxication, is within the meaning of an act which prohibits 'the sale of “spirituous, malt or intoxicating liquors” without taking out a specified [312] license; and this is true even though the same may contain certain other 'constituents which, either separately or in 'conjunction with 'alcohol, possess useful medicinal properties.

Submitted January 6, Decided November 21, 1897. Indictment for selling liquor. Before Judge Sweat. Appling superior court. September term, 1896. E. D. Q-ralvam, for plaintiff in error. J. W. Bennett, solicitor-general, and Toomer & Reynolds, contra.

2. The sale 'of such a preparation without the prescribed license is unlawful, whether the vendor in making the s'ale intended that it should be used as a medicine or otherwise, and Without reference to the purpose for which it was ‘bought by the purchaser.

3. The verdict was supported hy the evidence, and no error of law was committed.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chapman v. State, 27 S.E. 789, 100 Ga. 311, 1897 Ga. LEXIS 47 (Ga. 1897).

27 S.E. 789 (Chapman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Stell
14 S.W.2d 515 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1929)
McLean v. People
66 Colo. 486 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1919)
Ware v. State
65 S.E. 333 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1909)
Colwell v. State
37 S.E. 129 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1900)