Chapman v. State ex rel. Conerley

5 Blackf. 111, 1839 Ind. LEXIS 35
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedMay 24, 1839
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 5 Blackf. 111 (Chapman v. State ex rel. Conerley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chapman v. State ex rel. Conerley, 5 Blackf. 111, 1839 Ind. LEXIS 35 (Ind. 1839).

Opinion

Blackford, J.

A justice of the peace, on the 27th of January, 1838, issued a warrant against Chapman in a case of bastardy. On the next day, which was Sunday, the warrant was returned, the defendant brought before the justice, the cause tried, and the defendant adjudged to be the father of the child, &c.

G. G. Dunn, for the plaintiff. J. W. Payne and R. W. Thompson, for the defendant.

The cause was certified to the Circuit, Court.

Upon the calling of the cause in the Circuit Court, the defendant moved to dismiss the suit, on the ground that the trial before the justice took place on a Sunday. The motion was overruled, the cause tried, and a verdict and judgment rendered against the defendant.

The question presented by this record is, Could the justice examine' and decide the cause on a Sunday ? Our answer is, that he could not. Sunday is dies non juridicus; and, by the common law, all judicial proceedings which take place on that day are void. Swann v. Broome, 3 Burr. 1595.—Pearce v. Atwood, 13 Mass. 324.—Arthur v. Mosby, 2 Bibb, 589. Our statute has made some exceptions to this rule, but they do not apply to the case before us.

The motion made in the Circuit Court to dismiss the suit should have been sustained.

Per Curiam.

The judgment is reversed, and the proceedings subsequent to the motion to dismiss the .suit -set aside, with costs. Cause remanded, &c.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Devault v. Sampson
221 P. 284 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1923)
Ex parte Tice
49 P. 1038 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1897)
Stone v. United States
64 F. 667 (Ninth Circuit, 1894)
Fox v. Nachtsheim
29 P. 140 (Washington Supreme Court, 1892)
Hodge v. State
29 Fla. 500 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1892)
City of Parsons v. Lindsay
41 Kan. 336 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1889)
Hauswirth v. Sullivan
6 Mont. 203 (Montana Supreme Court, 1886)
Ex parte White
15 Nev. 146 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1880)
State v. Green
37 Mo. 466 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1866)
Baxter v. People
8 Ill. 368 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1846)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 Blackf. 111, 1839 Ind. LEXIS 35, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chapman-v-state-ex-rel-conerley-ind-1839.