Chapman v. State ex rel. Conerley
This text of 5 Blackf. 111 (Chapman v. State ex rel. Conerley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A justice of the peace, on the 27th of January, 1838, issued a warrant against Chapman in a case of bastardy. On the next day, which was Sunday, the warrant was returned, the defendant brought before the justice, the cause tried, and the defendant adjudged to be the father of the child, &c.
The cause was certified to the Circuit, Court.
Upon the calling of the cause in the Circuit Court, the defendant moved to dismiss the suit, on the ground that the trial before the justice took place on a Sunday. The motion was overruled, the cause tried, and a verdict and judgment rendered against the defendant.
The question presented by this record is, Could the justice examine' and decide the cause on a Sunday ? Our answer is, that he could not. Sunday is dies non juridicus; and, by the common law, all judicial proceedings which take place on that day are void. Swann v. Broome, 3 Burr. 1595.—Pearce v. Atwood, 13 Mass. 324.—Arthur v. Mosby, 2 Bibb, 589. Our statute has made some exceptions to this rule, but they do not apply to the case before us.
The motion made in the Circuit Court to dismiss the suit should have been sustained.
The judgment is reversed, and the proceedings subsequent to the motion to dismiss the .suit -set aside, with costs. Cause remanded, &c.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 Blackf. 111, 1839 Ind. LEXIS 35, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chapman-v-state-ex-rel-conerley-ind-1839.