Chapman v. State
82 So. 644, 17 Ala. App. 154, 1919 Ala. App. LEXIS 168
Opinion
We have examined the record of this case and considered e'aeh exception reserved by the defendant on the trial, and find no error on the part of the trial judge or in the record. The judgment is affirmed.
No brief having been filed in support of the appeal, following the rule announced in Simmons v. State, ante, p. 153, 82 South. 643, no opinion will he written.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Chapman v. State, 82 So. 644, 17 Ala. App. 154, 1919 Ala. App. LEXIS 168 (Ala. Ct. App. 1919).
82 So. 644 (Chapman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dawes v. State
135 So. 921 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1931)