Chapman v. State

73 Ala. 20
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedDecember 15, 1882
StatusPublished

This text of 73 Ala. 20 (Chapman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chapman v. State, 73 Ala. 20 (Ala. 1882).

Opinion

STONE, J.

— The present is an indictment under section 4159 of the Code of 1876, which declares it a misdemeanor in the clerk of a circuit court, “who fails to perform any duty imposed on him, for the'failure to perform which no other penalty is provided.” The offense charged is, tiiat Chapman, who was clerk of the circuit court, failed to issue execution within ■fifteen days after the adjournment of the Circuit Court of Choctaw county. The indictment is framed under §§ 3181, 4159.of the Code of 1876. It will be observed that section 4159 converts into a misdemeanor only the failure to perform ■some duty imposed by law, “for the failure to perforin which no other penalty is provided.” Section 3380 of the Code does provide another penalty “ for failing to issue execution as prescribed by section 3181 [of the Code] within the time prescribed by law.” This case, then, does not fall within the statute, and no indictment will lie for the alleged dereliction. We need not notice other points raised by the demurrer.

The judgment of the circuit court is reversed; but inasmuch as no conviction can he had on the charge contained in the indictment, the cause is not remanded.

Let the accused go hence without day.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
73 Ala. 20, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chapman-v-state-ala-1882.