Chapman v. Smith

Supreme Court of Florida

Chapman v. Smith

85 So. 256, 79 Fla. 829

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided May 13, 1920·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having been heretofore submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment aforesaid, and .argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen ánd inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it-is, therefore, [830]*830considered, ordered and- adjudged by the court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby, .affirmed.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This cause having been heretofore submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment aforesaid, and .argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen ánd inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it-is, therefore, [830]*830considered, ordered and- adjudged by the court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby, .affirmed.

All concur.

Chapman v. Smith, 85 So. 256, 79 Fla. 829 (Fla. 1920).

Pincite

85 So. 256 (Chapman v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.