Chapman v. Schultz
47 A.D.2d 806, 367 N.Y.S.2d 1018, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9128
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 6, 1975·Published·Cited by 6 cases
Opinion
Order reversed, with costs, and motion denied. Memorandum: The issues presented on this appeal are identical with those before the court in Ziemba v. Sternberg (45 A D 2d 230). In accordance with our holding therein, the order of Special Term, made prior to that decision, should be reversed and defendant’s motion denied. All concur, Mahoney, J. under the constraint of Ziemba v. Sternberg (supra) (Appeal from order of Monroe Special Term in medical malpractice action.) Present — Marsh, P. J., Moule, Mahoney, Del Vecchio and Witmer, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Chapman v. Schultz, 47 A.D.2d 806, 367 N.Y.S.2d 1018, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9128 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).
47 A.D.2d 806 (Chapman v. Schultz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Martinez v. Hartford Hospital, No. 338196 (May 21, 1991)
1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 4612 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1991)
Heni Sorkin v. S. Lee
78 A.D.2d 180 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
Johnson v. Yeshiva University
364 N.E.2d 1340 (New York Court of Appeals, 1977)
Karlsons v. Guerinot
57 A.D.2d 73 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
Howard v. Lecher
53 A.D.2d 420 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)