Chapman v. Schultz
This text of 47 A.D.2d 806 (Chapman v. Schultz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order reversed, with costs, and motion denied. Memorandum: The issues presented on this appeal are identical with those before the court in Ziemba v. Sternberg (45 A D 2d 230). In accordance with our holding therein, the order of Special Term, made prior to that decision, should be reversed and defendant’s motion denied. All concur, Mahoney, J. under the constraint of Ziemba v. Sternberg (supra) (Appeal from order of Monroe Special Term in medical malpractice action.) Present — Marsh, P. J., Moule, Mahoney, Del Vecchio and Witmer, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
47 A.D.2d 806, 367 N.Y.S.2d 1018, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chapman-v-schultz-nyappdiv-1975.