Chapman v. Ray

165 S.E. 98, 175 Ga. 424, 1932 Ga. LEXIS 262

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided August 13, 1932·No. No. 8835·Published

Opinion

I-Iill, J.

Under the pleadings and the evidence in this case, the court did not err in refusing an interlocutory injunction.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Hawes Cloud, for plaintiff. J. A. Mitchell and P. H. Mitchell, for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chapman v. Ray, 165 S.E. 98, 175 Ga. 424, 1932 Ga. LEXIS 262 (Ga. 1932).

Pincite

165 S.E. 98 (Chapman v. Ray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.