Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Chapman v. Ray

Chapman v. Ray

165 S.E. 98, 175 Ga. 424, 1932 Ga. LEXIS 262
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedAugust 13, 1932
DocketNo. 8835
StatusPublished

This text of 165 S.E. 98 (Chapman v. Ray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chapman v. Ray, 165 S.E. 98, 175 Ga. 424, 1932 Ga. LEXIS 262 (Ga. 1932).

Opinion

I-Iill, J.

Under the pleadings and the evidence in this case, the court did not err in refusing an interlocutory injunction.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Hawes Cloud, for plaintiff. J. A. Mitchell and P. H. Mitchell, for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
165 S.E. 98, 175 Ga. 424, 1932 Ga. LEXIS 262, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chapman-v-ray-ga-1932.