Chapman v. Pier 1 Imports (U.S.) Inc.

593 F.3d 974, 22 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1472, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 1858, 2010 WL 337938
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Chapman v. Pier 1 Imports (U.S.) Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 631 F.3d 939
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided January 26, 2010·No. 07-16326·Published

Opinion

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel *975 opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chapman v. Pier 1 Imports (U.S.) Inc., 593 F.3d 974, 22 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1472, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 1858, 2010 WL 337938 (9th Cir. 2010).

593 F.3d 974 (Chapman v. Pier 1 Imports (U.S.) Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.