Chapman v. PHIL'S COUNTY LINE SERVICE, INC.
739 N.W.2d 82, 480 Mich. 901
This text of 739 N.W.2d 82 (Chapman v. PHIL'S COUNTY LINE SERVICE, INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Chapman v. PHIL'S COUNTY LINE SERVICE, INC., 739 N.W.2d 82, 480 Mich. 901 (Mich. 2007).
Opinion
Matthew CHAPMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
PHIL'S COUNTY LINE SERVICE, INC., Philip Lodholtz, and County Line Towing, Defendants-Not Participating, and
Osceola County and Mark Warren Cool, Defendants-Appellees, and
Department of Transportation, Defendant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 19, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH and MARILYN J. KELLY, JJ., would grant leave to appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
People v. Strawther
739 N.W.2d 82 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2007)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
739 N.W.2d 82, 480 Mich. 901, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chapman-v-phils-county-line-service-inc-mich-2007.