Chapman v. PHIL'S COUNTY LINE SERVICE, INC.
739 N.W.2d 82, 480 Mich. 901
Opinion
Matthew CHAPMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
PHIL'S COUNTY LINE SERVICE, INC., Philip Lodholtz, and County Line Towing, Defendants-Not Participating, and
Osceola County and Mark Warren Cool, Defendants-Appellees, and
Department of Transportation, Defendant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 19, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH and MARILYN J. KELLY, JJ., would grant leave to appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Chapman v. PHIL'S COUNTY LINE SERVICE, INC., 739 N.W.2d 82, 480 Mich. 901 (Mich. 2007).
739 N.W.2d 82 (Chapman v. PHIL'S COUNTY LINE SERVICE, INC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Strawther
739 N.W.2d 82 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2007)