Chapman v. Mears
This text of 56 Vt. 389 (Chapman v. Mears) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The opinion of the court was delivered by
The principal debtor ■ conveyed a stock of goods to the trustee, and in consideration the trustee promised to pay certain demands against the debtor, among them the plaintiff’s. We think this constitutes a credit in the hands of Mark Mears which can be reached by the trustee process. Corey v. Powers, 18 Vt. 587; Woodward v. Wyman, 53 Vt. 645. Before the arrangement Mark had a lien upon the goods as security for his claims against A. W. Mears. By it he became the absolute [390]*390owner; so we think there was an ample consideration for his promise. The trustee’s name was inserted in the writ before-service upon the principal.defendant; he was therefore properly summoned. R. L., s. 1082.
Judgment reversed, and judgment that the trustee is chargeable for the amount of the judgment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
56 Vt. 389, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chapman-v-mears-vt-1883.