Chapman v. Long Island Daily Press Publishing Co.
256 A.D. 1073, 11 N.Y.S.2d 583, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6188
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 3, 1939·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Action for libel. Judgment for the defendants unanimously affirmed, with costs. In view of the jury’s verdict in favor of the defendants other than Hofmann, the dismissal as to the latter presents no practical question. (Featherston v. N. & C. Turnpike, 71 Hun, 109, 111; Wolf v. Kenyon, 242 App. Div. 116; Good Health Dairy Products Corp. v. Emery, 275 N. Y. 14; Freeman on Judgments [5th ed.], § 469, pp. 1031,1032.) Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Close, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Chapman v. Long Island Daily Press Publishing Co., 256 A.D. 1073, 11 N.Y.S.2d 583, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6188 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).
256 A.D. 1073 (Chapman v. Long Island Daily Press Publishing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Riordan v. Ferguson
147 F.2d 983 (Second Circuit, 1945)