Chapman v. Lamm

415 So. 2d 890, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20861
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Chapman v. Lamm. Read the opinion of the Court — 388 So. 2d 1048
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 28, 1982·No. No. 79-1550·Published

Opinion

ORDER ON MANDATE

PER CURIAM.

WHEREAS, the judgment of this court was entered on August 5, 1980 (388 So.2d 1048) reversing the order of the Circuit Court of Dade County, Florida, in the above styled appeal, and

WHEREAS, on review of this court’s judgment by notice of appeal, the Supreme Court of Florida (413 So.2d 749) by its opinion and judgment filed March 11, 1982 and mandate now lodged in this court affirmed the results of this court’s judgment, but, for the reasons expressed, the opinion is affirmed in part and disapproved in part.

NOW, THEREFORE, It is Ordered that the mandate of this court issued in this cause November 7, 1980 is withdrawn, the opinion and judgment of this court filed August 5, 1980 insofar as it is in conflict with or fails to conform to the views expressed in the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida aforesaid is withdrawn and vacated, and the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is herewith made the opinion and judgment of this court. The opinion and judgment of this court, except as withdrawn and vacated aforesaid, is adhered to. Costs allowed shall be taxed in the trial court (Rule 9.400 (a), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chapman v. Lamm, 415 So. 2d 890, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20861 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

415 So. 2d 890 (Chapman v. Lamm) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chapman v. Lamm
388 So. 2d 1048 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Lamm v. Chapman
413 So. 2d 749 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1982)