Chapman v. Lacour

25 Tex. 94
Texas Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1860·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Bell, J.

There was no error in the judgment of the court below sustaining the exception to the plea of non-joinder of parties, interposed by the defendant, Chapman. Although Simms, and Close and Cushman might have made themselves parties to the suit, and asserted their respective rights, if they had any, yet they were not necessary parties, and their rights are in no respect affected by the judgment in this cause.

The judgment of the court below is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chapman v. Lacour, 25 Tex. 94 (Tex. 1860).

25 Tex. 94 (Chapman v. Lacour) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Oak Park Trust & Savings Bank, Oak Park v. O'Byrne
457 S.W.2d 277 (Texas Supreme Court, 1970)
Hume v. Perry
136 S.W. 594 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1911)
Silberberg v. Pearson
12 S.W. 850 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1889)
Wood v. Loughmiller
48 Tex. 203 (Texas Supreme Court, 1877)
Preston v. Breedlove
45 Tex. 47 (Texas Supreme Court, 1876)