Chapman v. Lacour

Texas Supreme Court

Chapman v. Lacour

25 Tex. 94

CourtTexas Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 1, 1860

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 25 Tex. 94 (Chapman v. Lacour) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chapman v. Lacour, 25 Tex. 94 (Tex. 1860).

Pincite

Opinion

Bell, J.

There was no error in the judgment of the court below sustaining the exception to the plea of non-joinder of parties, interposed by the defendant, Chapman. Although Simms, and Close and Cushman might have made themselves parties to the suit, and asserted their respective rights, if they had any, yet they were not necessary parties, and their rights are in no respect affected by the judgment in this cause.

The judgment of the court below is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell, J.

There was no error in the judgment of the court below sustaining the exception to the plea of non-joinder of parties, interposed by the defendant, Chapman. Although Simms, and Close and Cushman might have made themselves parties to the suit, and asserted their respective rights, if they had any, yet they were not necessary parties, and their rights are in no respect affected by the judgment in this cause.

The judgment of the court below is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 Tex. 94, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chapman-v-lacour-tex-1860.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack