Chapman v. Jones Chemicals, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Chapman v. Jones Chemicals, Inc.

887 S.W.2d 782, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1829, 1994 WL 663381

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 29, 1994·No. No. 66011·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Employee appeals from a final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) denying his claim for Workers’ Compensation benefits. The Administrative Law Judge found that claimant was not entitled to benefits because she failed to give employer adequate notice of her injury, and this decision was affirmed by the Commission. We affirm. The order of the Commission is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record, and an extended opinion would have no prec-edential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Employee appeals from a final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) denying his claim for Workers’ Compensation benefits. The Administrative Law Judge found that claimant was not entitled to benefits because she failed to give employer adequate notice of her injury, and this decision was affirmed by the Commission. We affirm. The order of the Commission is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record, and an extended opinion would have no prec-edential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Chapman v. Jones Chemicals, Inc., 887 S.W.2d 782, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1829, 1994 WL 663381 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

887 S.W.2d 782 (Chapman v. Jones Chemicals, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.