Chapman v. Grizzard
99 S.E. 893, 24 Ga. App. 86, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 421
This text of 99 S.E. 893 (Chapman v. Grizzard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Chapman v. Grizzard, 99 S.E. 893, 24 Ga. App. 86, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 421 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).
Opinion
The various exceptions to the charge of the court are without substantial merit, there was evidence to authorize the verdict returned, and the trial judge did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
99 S.E. 893, 24 Ga. App. 86, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 421, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chapman-v-grizzard-gactapp-1919.