Chapman v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

210 N.C. 842
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedDecember 16, 1936
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 210 N.C. 842 (Chapman v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chapman v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 210 N.C. 842 (N.C. 1936).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The findings of fact on which the judgment was rendered in this action were supported by the evidence at the trial.

An examination of the complaint in this action and of the complaint in the action instituted by the plaintiff against the defendant in the municipal court of High Point, discloses that the causes of action alleged in said complaints are substantially the same. The evidence at the trial of said actions is likewise substantially the same. There was no error in the findings of fact.

The judgment dismissing the action is supported by the findings of fact and is affirmed on the authority of Hampton v. Spinning Co., 198 N. C., 235, 151 S. E., 266; Brown v. Johnson, 207 N. C., 807, 178 S. E., 570; Batson v. Laundry Co., 209 N. C., 223, 183 S. E., 413.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Charles S. Hunt v. Howard H. Bradshaw
251 F.2d 103 (Fourth Circuit, 1958)
Smith v. McDowell Furniture Co.
61 S.E.2d 96 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1950)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
210 N.C. 842, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chapman-v-great-atlantic-pacific-tea-co-nc-1936.