Chapman v. Ellison
7 Blackf. 46, 1844 Ind. LEXIS 14
This text of 7 Blackf. 46 (Chapman v. Ellison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Chapman v. Ellison, 7 Blackf. 46, 1844 Ind. LEXIS 14 (Ind. 1844).
Opinion
IN a suit on a promissory note, the declaration professing to set out only the legal effect of the note, omitted the words “For value received” which the note contained. Held, that the variance was immaterial. Crenshaw et al. v. Bullitt et al. 1 Blackf. 41, and note.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Crenshaw v. Bullitt
1 Blackf. 41 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1819)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
7 Blackf. 46, 1844 Ind. LEXIS 14, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chapman-v-ellison-ind-1844.