Chapman v. Eckler

227 A.D. 653

This text of 227 A.D. 653 (Chapman v. Eckler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chapman v. Eckler, 227 A.D. 653 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).

Opinion

Judgment and order reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, on the ground that there was error in excluding the evidence of the witness Fuller offered for the purpose of showing actual guilt of the plaintiff (Morris v. Corson, 7 Cow. 281, 284; George v. Johnson, 25 App. Div. 125,129; Paul v. Fargo, 84 id. 9,19; Mack v. Sharp, 138 Mich. 448; 5 Ann. Cas. 109, and note), and on the further ground that the court erred in excluding the proof of defendant’s belief when the warrant was sworn out. All concur. Present — Sears, P. J., Crouch, Taylor, Edgcomb and Thompson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

George v. Johnson
25 A.D. 125 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1898)
Morris v. Corson
7 Cow. 281 (New York Supreme Court, 1827)
Mack v. Sharp
101 N.W. 631 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1904)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
227 A.D. 653, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chapman-v-eckler-nyappdiv-1929.