Chapman v. Doe
This text of 255 A.D. 893 (Chapman v. Doe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Plaintiffs sold union-made beer, which they purchased from a Binghamton bottling corporation. The defendants asserted the right to picket the restaurants conducted by the two plaintiffs, upon the ground that the beer was delivered in a truck driven by a chauffeur who was not a member of the Chauffeurs Union, of which a majority of the chauffeurs in the vicinity belonged. This is a secondary boycott, and not within the protection of the statutes of the State. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee and Crapser, JJ., concur; Bliss, J., dissents.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
255 A.D. 893, 7 N.Y.S.2d 470, 3 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 763, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5777, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chapman-v-doe-nyappdiv-1938.