Chapman v. Doe
Opinion
— Plaintiffs sold union-made beer, which they purchased from a Binghamton bottling corporation. The defendants asserted the right to picket the restaurants conducted by the two plaintiffs, upon the ground that the beer was delivered in a truck driven by a chauffeur who was not a member of the Chauffeurs Union, of which a majority of the chauffeurs in the vicinity belonged. This is a secondary boycott, and not within the protection of the statutes of the State. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee and Crapser, JJ., concur; Bliss, J., dissents.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
255 A.D. 893 (Chapman v. Doe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.