Chapman v. Division of Highways

24 Ct. Cl. 156
CourtWest Virginia Court of Claims
DecidedAugust 15, 2002
DocketCC-01-336
StatusPublished

This text of 24 Ct. Cl. 156 (Chapman v. Division of Highways) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chapman v. Division of Highways, 24 Ct. Cl. 156 (W. Va. Super. Ct. 2002).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This claim was submitted to the Courtfor decisionupon a Stipulation entered into by claimants and respondent wherein certain facts and circumstances of the claim were agreed to as follows:

1. On July 29, 2001, claimant, Christi Chapman, was traveling west on 1-64 near the Teays Valley exit, Putnam County, when her vehicle struck a hole causing damage.

2. Respondent was responsible for the maintenance of 1-64 in Putnam County and respondent failed to maintain properly this area of 1-64 on the date of this incident.

3. As a result of this incident, claimants’ vehicle sustained damage in the amount of $444.00.

4. Respondent agrees that the amount of damages as put forth by the claimants is fair and reasonable.

The Court has reviewed the facts of the claim and finds that respondent was negligent in its maintenance of 1-64 in Putnam County on the date of this incident; that the negligence of respondent was the proximate cause of the damages sustained to claimants’ vehicle; and that the amount of the damages agreed to by the parties is fair and reasonable. Thus, claimants may make a recovery for their loss.

Accordingly, the Court is of the opinion to and does make an award in the amount of $444.00.

Award of $444.00.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
24 Ct. Cl. 156, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chapman-v-division-of-highways-wvctcl-2002.