Chapman v. Crichet
96 S.W.2d 64
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Chapman v. Crichet. Read the opinion of the Court — 127 Tex. 590 →
Opinion
Defendant in error in his motion for rehearing directs attention to an error in the opinion where the date of the deed from Crichet to McMahon is erroneously given as November 1, 1927, instead of January 2, 1929, the correct date. This error has been corrected in the original opinion.
The motion for rehearing has been carefully considered and is overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Chapman v. Crichet, 96 S.W.2d 64 (Tex. 1936).
96 S.W.2d 64 (Chapman v. Crichet) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.