Chapman v. Commonwealth

464 F. App'x 143
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 3, 2012
DocketNo. 11-7431
StatusPublished

This text of 464 F. App'x 143 (Chapman v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chapman v. Commonwealth, 464 F. App'x 143 (4th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Ramon Charles Chapman appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(2) (2006). On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Chapman’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Chapman has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 1915A
28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(2)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
464 F. App'x 143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chapman-v-commonwealth-ca4-2012.