Chapman v. Commissioner
This text of 672 F. App'x 309 (Chapman v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Terry R. Chapman appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, granting summary judgment to the Commissioner, and upholding the Commissioner’s denial of Chapman’s application for disability insurance benefits. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Chapman v. Comm’r, No. 1:14-cv-03761-WMN (D. Md. Feb. 12, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
672 F. App'x 309, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chapman-v-commissioner-ca4-2017.