Chapman v. Commercial National Bank

Supreme Court of Georgia

Chapman v. Commercial National Bank

68 S.E.2d 603, 208 Ga. 593, 1952 Ga. LEXIS 292

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 16, 1952

DocketNo. 17659

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 68 S.E.2d 603 (Chapman v. Commercial National Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chapman v. Commercial National Bank, 68 S.E.2d 603, 208 Ga. 593, 1952 Ga. LEXIS 292 (Ga. 1952).

Pincite

Opinion

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

1. No decision or judgment in a case which is pending in the court below is deemed to be a final judgment unless it is, or would have been if rendered as claimed, a final disposition of the cause or final as to some material party thereto. Code (Ann. Supp.), § 6-701 (Ga. L. 1890-1, p. 82; 1946, pp. 726, 730); Mechanics’ & Traders’ Bank of Rome v. Harrison, 68 Ga. 463; Irby v. Irby, 167 Ga. 708, 710 (146 S. E. 489); Ryals v. Atlantic Life Ins. Co., 181 Ga. 843 (184 S. E. 698).

2. The decision complained of here, if it had been rendered as claimed by the plaintiff in error, would have been a final judgment terminating the case, and the bill of exceptions can not be dismissed as being premature, as in Ryals v. Atlantic Life Ins. Co., supra, and Ryles v. Moore, 191 Ga. 661 (13 S. E. 2d, 672).

3. No answer having been filed by the defendant bank within the statutory time, and the time for filing not having been extended or the default-opened as a matter of right within 15 days thereafter—the suit not being for unliquidated damages—the case was automatically in default, under Code (Ann. Supp.) § 110-401 (Ga. L. 1799, Cobb 486; 1895, p. 45; 1946, pp. 761, 777), and the court erred in overruling the oral motion of the petitioner to enter judgment in her favor when the case was duly called for trial, thereby rendering nugatory all further proceedings in the case.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

1. No decision or judgment in a case which is pending in the court below is deemed to be a final judgment unless it is, or would have been if rendered as claimed, a final disposition of the cause or final as to some material party thereto. Code (Ann. Supp.), § 6-701 (Ga. L. 1890-1, p. 82; 1946, pp. 726, 730); Mechanics’ & Traders’ Bank of Rome v. Harrison, 68 Ga. 463; Irby v. Irby, 167 Ga. 708, 710 (146 S. E. 489); Ryals v. Atlantic Life Ins. Co., 181 Ga. 843 (184 S. E. 698).

2. The decision complained of here, if it had been rendered as claimed by the plaintiff in error, would have been a final judgment terminating the case, and the bill of exceptions can not be dismissed as being premature, as in Ryals v. Atlantic Life Ins. Co., supra, and Ryles v. Moore, 191 Ga. 661 (13 S. E. 2d, 672).

3. No answer having been filed by the defendant bank within the statutory time, and the time for filing not having been extended or the default-opened as a matter of right within 15 days thereafter—the suit not being for unliquidated damages—the case was automatically in default, under Code (Ann. Supp.) § 110-401 (Ga. L. 1799, Cobb 486; 1895, p. 45; 1946, pp. 761, 777), and the court erred in overruling the oral motion of the petitioner to enter judgment in her favor when the case was duly called for trial, thereby rendering nugatory all further proceedings in the case.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

68 S.E.2d 603, 208 Ga. 593, 1952 Ga. LEXIS 292, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chapman-v-commercial-national-bank-ga-1952.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack