Chapman v. Chattooga Oil Mill Co.
This text of 90 S.E. 713 (Chapman v. Chattooga Oil Mill Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action upon a promissory note the defendant filed a plea, but omitted to swear to it. At a term subsequent to the trial term, the defendant being absent, the plea was stricken, and judgment was rendered for the plaintiff. Twelve days after the court had ad[92]*92journed for the term, the defendant filed a motion to set aside the judgment' and to reinstate the case. In the motion it was alleged, that the defendant had employed an attorney to represent him; that he had been informed by his attorney that his presence would not be necessary, and, being so advised, he did not attend court, on account of the illness of his wife; and that the attorney neglected the case and did not appear and represent the defendant at the trial. The prayer was that the judgment be set aside, that he be allowed to swear to his plea, and that the case be reinstated upon the docket for trial. Held, that the motion was properly overruled.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
90 S.E. 713, 146 Ga. 91, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 597, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chapman-v-chattooga-oil-mill-co-ga-1916.