Chapman v. Chapman

32 S.W. 871, 88 Tex. 641, 1895 Tex. LEXIS 528
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 14, 1895
DocketNo. 805.
StatusPublished
Cited by43 cases

This text of 32 S.W. 871 (Chapman v. Chapman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chapman v. Chapman, 32 S.W. 871, 88 Tex. 641, 1895 Tex. LEXIS 528 (Tex. 1895).

Opinion

GAINES, Chief Justice.

—In refusing the application in this case, we desire to say, that we do so because we fully concur with the Court *642 of Civil Appeals in holding, that the decision of the case does not involve the adjudication of the rights of the applicant to an undivided half of the property acquired by the intestate since their putative marriage. This being a contest as to a right to administer upon the estate, that question could not properly be brought into the case either in the County Court or in the District Court, to which an appeal was taken.

Delivered November 14, 1895.

We think the Court of Civil Appeals correctly held, - that the appellee was lawfully married to the intestate, and that she was therefore his lawful widow, and was entitled under the statute to administer the estate.

The application for a writ of error is therefore refused.

Eefused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

in Re: Roger Arash Farahmand
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2015
Turner v. Rhea
317 S.W.2d 229 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1958)
Free-Flow Muffler Company v. Kliewer
283 S.W.2d 778 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1955)
Banker v. Jefferson County Water Control & Improvement District No. One
277 S.W.2d 130 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1955)
The Texas Co. v. State
267 S.W.2d 456 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1954)
Ramsey v. Dunlop
205 S.W.2d 979 (Texas Supreme Court, 1947)
Gillette Motor Transport Co. v. Wichita Falls & Southern R.
170 S.W.2d 629 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1943)
Republic Ins. Co. v. Dickson
87 S.W.2d 899 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1935)
Mutual Life Ins. Ass'n v. Smelley
68 S.W.2d 1106 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1934)
Manufacturers' Finance Corp. v. Fort Worth Paper Co.
68 S.W.2d 307 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1933)
Gabert v. Eastus
62 S.W.2d 618 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1933)
Burford Oil Co. v. Jefferies
59 S.W.2d 293 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1933)
Blackwell v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.
54 S.W.2d 251 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1932)
Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Jones Inv. Co.
47 S.W.2d 362 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1932)
Barnes v. Missouri, K. &. T. Ry. Co. of Texas
8 S.W.2d 295 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1928)
Henderson Tire & Rubber Co. v. Roberts
1 S.W.2d 510 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1927)
City of Desdemona v. Wilhite
297 S.W. 874 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1927)
Fisher v. El Paso Egg Producers' Ass'n
278 S.W. 262 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1925)
Tri-State Motor Co. v. King
277 S.W. 433 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1925)
Amarillo Oil Co. v. Ranch Creek Oil & Gas Co.
271 S.W. 145 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
32 S.W. 871, 88 Tex. 641, 1895 Tex. LEXIS 528, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chapman-v-chapman-tex-1895.