Home/Supreme Court/Chapman v. Chapman

Chapman v. Chapman

203 U.S. 586, 27 S. Ct. 784, 51 L. Ed. 329, 1906 U.S. LEXIS 1651
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedDecember 17, 1906
DocketNo. 239
StatusPublished

This text of 203 U.S. 586 (Chapman v. Chapman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chapman v. Chapman, 203 U.S. 586, 27 S. Ct. 784, 51 L. Ed. 329, 1906 U.S. LEXIS 1651 (1906).

Opinion

[586]*586In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Nebraska.

[587]*587Decided December 17, 1906. Mr. William E. Gantt and Mr. Herbert L. Baker for plaintiff in error. Mr. E. F. Colladay, Mr. J. W. Woodrough and Mr. W. F. Gurley for defendant in error.

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Haseltine v. Central Bank, 183 U. S. 130; Schlosser v. Hemphill, 198 U. S. 173.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Haseltine v. Central Bank of Springfield
183 U.S. 130 (Supreme Court, 1901)
Schlosser v. Hemphill
198 U.S. 173 (Supreme Court, 1905)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
203 U.S. 586, 27 S. Ct. 784, 51 L. Ed. 329, 1906 U.S. LEXIS 1651, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chapman-v-chapman-scotus-1906.