Home/Supreme Court/Chapman v. California

Chapman v. California

383 U.S. 956
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMarch 28, 1966
DocketNo. 875
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 383 U.S. 956 (Chapman v. California) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chapman v. California, 383 U.S. 956 (1966).

Opinion

Sup. Ct. Cal. Motion for leave to proceed-m forma pauperis granted. Petition for writ of certiorari granted, limited to the following questions:

"Where there is a violation of the rule of Griffin v. California, 380 U. S. 609, (1) can the error be held to be [957]*957harmless, and (2) if so, was the error harmless in this case?”
Morris Lavine for petitioners. Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, Doris H. Maier, Assistant Attorney General, and Raymond M. Momboisse, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.

Case transferred to the appellate docket.

The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Teale
450 P.2d 564 (California Supreme Court, 1969)
State v. Chasse
230 A.2d 51 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
383 U.S. 956, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chapman-v-california-scotus-1966.